The omission of the auxiliary verb do in wh-
questions will often confuse English language learners . The general
structure of a wh- question involving do is
Wh -word + Auxiliary do + subject + main verb++adverbial
When the wh-word is the object of the verb , do is obligatory .It has been obligatory in Modern English since the 18 th century
Look at the following sentence:
You saw somebody. .
Somebody is the object of the verb saw. If we ask a question based on somebody , it would be
Whom did you see?
Whom is the object of the verb see and , therefore, did is used as an auxiliary .
Look at another example :
You wrote something
Something is the object of the verb wrote . If we ask a question based on something , it would be
What did you write ?
Please remember that the question-words whom , what which and who are interrogative pronouns When they are the subject of the verb, the auxiliary do is not used in questions . Look at this sentence :
Somebody called you on the phone ..
Somebody is the subject of the sentence , isn't it ?
If we ask a question based on somebody it would be
Who called you on the phone?
Who is the subject of the verb called and , therefore, do is omitted in the question.
What frightened you ?
Here, do is omitted because what is the subject of the verb frightened . Something frightened you and the question is based on something which is the subject of the verb .
The
English language omits do- support only when the question word is the
subject of the verb
The question-word itself is the subject , though. in an interrogative form . Subject-operator inversion is an invariable syntactic feature of an English interrogative sentence. But as there is no subject in the body of the question , there is no need to bring in the dummy auxiliary do .for subject-operator inversion .
.
The question-word itself is the subject , though. in an interrogative form . Subject-operator inversion is an invariable syntactic feature of an English interrogative sentence. But as there is no subject in the body of the question , there is no need to bring in the dummy auxiliary do .for subject-operator inversion .
.
Thank you for visiting
Prof . V.P.Rajappan
Thank you very much, Professor. Yours is the best explanation I found.
ReplyDelete